302 Team Murphy MediaSmyrna · Delaware
Home · News Stories

SHOT TWICE IN THE BACK. HE SAYS IT WAS SELF-DEFENSE.

Sun Oct 18, 2026, 07:13 PM EDT · 885 words

Picture this: August 2024. A 21st-floor luxury apartment in New York City. Floor-to-ceiling windows looking out over Manhattan. Marble bathroom. The kind of place that costs more per month than most working people make in a year.

Meisha Williams is on that marble floor. Dead. Two bullets in her back.

The man who pulled the trigger is Robert Wooten. And his story goes like this: she came at him with a knife, so he grabbed HER gun from her Gucci purse and fired. Self-defense. He had no choice.

Now here’s where it gets tangled — and it gets tangled fast.

Meisha Williams had a pending felony charge hanging over her head when she died. For what? For stabbing Robert Wooten at a Virginia gas station three months earlier. Let that sink in for a second. She allegedly put a knife in HIM in May. By August, he’s standing in her bathroom putting two bullets in her back and telling the police it was self-defense.

If that sounds insane, you’re not wrong. But wait — there’s more.

They had orders of protection against each other. Not one order — two. He had one against her. She had one against him. On paper, these two people weren’t supposed to be within a hundred yards of each other. The court looked at their history and said: stay away, or somebody’s going to die.

In reality? They kept finding their way back to the same rooms. The same fights. The same weapons within arm’s reach.

The prosecution’s theory is as simple as it gets: two shots in the back isn’t self-defense. It’s not complicated. You don’t shoot someone who’s running away from you because you’re afraid for your life. A person charging at you with a knife doesn’t end up with bullets in their back. The geometry doesn’t work. The physics doesn’t work. The story doesn’t work.

But the defense has an answer for that, and it’s the kind of answer that keeps juries up at night. They say it happened in a split second. Chaos. A knife flashing in a bathroom barely big enough to turn around in. A gun sitting in a purse on the counter. A man fighting for his life in a space the size of a closet. They say in close quarters, bodies twist. People turn. A “shot in the back” can happen in the middle of a life-or-death struggle, when nobody’s standing still and everybody’s moving.

And then there are the text messages.

The jury has sat through weeks of them — texts between Wooten and Williams, read aloud in open court. What they show isn’t a romance. It’s not even a normal toxic relationship. It’s obsession dressed up as love, warfare dressed up as passion. Fights that escalate into threats. Threats that turn into reconciliations. Restraining orders filed on Monday, violated by Wednesday. Promises to stay away, broken within days.

“I’m done with you” followed by “come over” twelve hours later. That’s the rhythm of it. Over and over.

Witnesses took the stand and described the pattern. Friends on both sides saw it. Family members tried to intervene. Everybody knew somebody was going to get hurt. The only open question was who, and when, and how bad.

Here’s what the coverage keeps dancing around, and it’s the part that should make your blood boil: the system had a dozen chances to stop this before anyone died.

Mutual orders of protection — printed, signed, filed, ignored. A pending felony stabbing charge — and she’s still walking around with a loaded gun in her purse. Two people with a documented, on-the-record history of trying to kill each other, and no one built a wall between them that actually held.

Every piece of paper in that file was screaming that somebody was going to end up dead. The courts issued the orders. The prosecutors filed the charges. The police wrote the reports. And then everyone went home, and Robert Wooten walked into Meisha Williams’ apartment anyway, and now she’s on a marble floor with two bullets in her back.

Ask yourself: what was the point of any of it? The orders, the charges, the whole machinery of the justice system — what did any of it actually do? It documented the disaster. It didn’t prevent it.

Now a jury in Manhattan has spent five weeks trying to untangle who was the aggressor in that bathroom. Five weeks of testimony. Experts arguing over bullet trajectories, over angles and distances, over what a human body does when it’s fighting for its life in a space the size of a phone booth. Character witnesses. Cops. Medical examiners. Lawyers billing by the hour while a dead woman waits for an answer.

The verdict could drop any day now.

Two shots. In the back. In a marble bathroom twenty-one floors above the streets of Manhattan. One person dead on the floor. One person standing over her, saying he had no choice.

The system watched it coming for months and did nothing.

You decide.

Brought to you by Team Murphy Media.

If you’d like us to continue this work and keep Shop Talk Weekly subscriptions free, consider making a donation: Cash App $dj7309 · PayPal paypal.me/dj7309. Can’t donate? Like, share & subscribe — that costs nothing and means everything.

First published in Shop Talk Weekly, Oct 18, 2026. Back to News Stories · Team Murphy Media home